|本期目录/Table of Contents|

ARFI联合BI-RADS分类对伴钙化乳腺肿块的临床应用价值

《现代肿瘤医学》[ISSN:1672-4992/CN:61-1415/R]

期数:
2019年20期
页码:
3670-3674
栏目:
论着(影像诊断)
出版日期:
2019-09-08

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical application value of ARFI combined with BI-RADS classification for breast masses with calcification
作者:
熊佳佳1;?于 韬1;?王浩天2;?侯怡如1;?孙嘉忆1;?刘叶秋1;?常 静1;?王米雪1
1.中国医科大学肿瘤医院,辽宁省肿瘤医院超声科,辽宁 沈阳 110042;2.大连医科大学第一临床学院,辽宁 大连 116044
Author(s):
Xiong Jiajia1;?Yu Tao1;?Wang Haotian2;?Hou Yiru1;?Sun Jiayi1;?Liu Yeqiu1;?Chang Jing1;?Wang Mixue1
1.Department of Ultrasound,China Medical University Cancer Hospital,Liaoning Provincial Tumor Hospital,Liaoning Shenyang 110042,China;2.The First Clinical College,Dalian Medical University,Liaoning Dalian 116044,China.
关键词:
声辐射力脉冲弹性成像;?BI-RADS分类;?乳腺肿块;?钙化
Keywords:
acoustic radiation force pulse elastography;?BI-RADS classification;?breast mass;?calcification
分类号:
R737.9
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2019.20.028
文献标识码:
A
qq自动领红包软件:
目的:探讨声辐射力脉冲弹性成像(ARFI)各指标及其联合常规超声乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类对伴钙化的乳腺肿块的临床应用价值。方法:选取收治我院的70位患者共72个伴钙化的乳腺肿块为研究对象,分别进行常规超声及ARFI检查,用声触诊组织成像(VTI)记录VTI图像与常规超声图像上病灶的面积比(AR)和VTI图像评分,用声触诊组织量化(VTQ)记录病灶内部剪切波速度(SWVi),病灶周边剪切波速度(SWVb),对所有参数绘制ROC曲线。结果:AR、VTI评分、SWVi和SWVb四种ARFI指标在伴钙化乳腺肿块良恶性之间差异有显着意义(均P<0.05)。SWVi、AR和VTI评分在对伴钙化的乳腺肿块诊断价值上没有明显差异(均P>0.05),但均高于SWVb,诊断价值有显着差异(均P<0.05)。SWVi、AR、VTI评分三种ARFI指标联合常规超声BI-RADS分类与单独超声BI-RADS分类诊断相比,诊断价值均有显着差异(均P<0.05),但三种联合诊断之间差异不显着(均P>0.05),对于BI-RADS 4a类肿块,SWVi和AR能够避免94.7%~100%良性病变的活检。结论:ARFI技术及其联合BI-RADS分类对伴钙化的乳腺肿块有较高的诊断价值,且能减少不必要的活检。
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the clinical application value of acoustic radiation pulse elastography (ARFI) and its combined conventional ultrasound breast image report and data system (BI-RADS) classification for breast masses with calcification.Methods:Seventy patients with 72 breast masses with calcification in our hospital were selected for the study.Routine ultrasonography and ARFI were performed.The area ratio (AR) of the lesions in the virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI) and conventional ultrasound images was recorded by VTI,and the VTI images were scored,the internal shear wave velocity (SWVi) of the lesion,the shear wave velocity (SWVb) around the lesion were recorded by acoustic palpation tissue quantification (VTQ),and the ROC curve was plotted for all parameters.Results:There were significant differences in AR,VTI score,SWVi and SWVb between benign and malignant breast masses with calcification (all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the diagnostic value of SWVi,AR and VTI scores in breast masses with calcification (all P>0.05),but they were higher than SWVb,and the diagnostic value was significantly different (all P<0.05).The diagnostic value of SWVi,AR and VTI scores combined with conventional ultrasound BI-RADS classification was significantly different from that of single ultrasound BI-RADS classification (all P<0.05),but there was no significant difference among the three combined diagnoses (all P>0.05).For BI-RADS 4a masses,SWVi,AR and VTI score were able to avoid biopsies from 94.7% to 100% benign lesions.Conclusion:ARFI technology and its combined BI-RADS classification have a high diagnostic value for breast masses with calcification and can reduce unnecessary biopsy.

参考文献/References

[1]Bundred SM,Zhou J,Whiteside S,et al.Impact of full-field digital mammography on pre-operative diagnosis and surgical treatment of mammographic microcalcification.[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2014,143(2):359-366.
[2]Machado Priscilla MD,Eisenbrey JR,Cavanaugh Barbara MD,et al.New image processing technique for evaluating breast microcalcifications[J].Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine,2012,31(6):885-893.
[3]Burkett BJ,Hanemann CW.A review of supplemental screening ultrasound for breast cancer:Certain populations of women with dense breast tissue may benefit[J].Acad Radiol,2016,23(12):1604-1609.
[4]Sickles EA,D'Orsi CJ,Bassett LW,et al.ACR BI-RADSAtlas,breast imaging reporting and data system[J].American College of Radiology,2013(1):363.
[5]Shiina T,Nightingale KR,Palmeri ML,et al.WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography:Part 1:Basic principles and terminology[J].Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology,2015,41(5):1126.
[6]Tozaki M,Isobe S,Sakamoto M.Combination of elastography and tissue quantification using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for differential diagnosis of breast masses[J].Japanese J Radiol,2012,30(8):659.
[7]Zhao Q,Wang XL,Sun JW,et al.Comparison of strain and acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of breast lesions by qualitative evaluation[J].Clin Hemorheol Microcirc,2018,70(1):39-50.
[8]Wang L,Wan CF,Du J.et al.Preliminary results of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging by combined qualitative and quantitative analyses for evaluation of breast lesions[J].J Ultrasound Med,2018,37(10):2405-2412.
[9]Bai M,Zhang HP,Xing JF,et al.Acoustic radiation force impulse technology in the differential diagnosis of solid breast masses with different sizes:Which features are most efficient[J].Biomed Res Int,2015,2015(1):410560.
[10]Jin ZQ,Li XR,Zhou HL,et al.Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of breast imaging reporting and data system category 4 breast lesions[J].Clinical Breast Cancer,2012,12(6):420-427.
[11]Wang SD,Wang L,Li ZX,et al.Differential diagnostic performance of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in small (≤20 mm) breast cancers:Is it valuable[J].Sci Rep,2017(7):8650.
[12]Tozaki M,Saito M,Joo C,et al.Ultrasonographic tissue quantification of the breast using acoustic radiation force impulse technology:phantom study and clinical application[J].Jpn J Radiol,2011,29(8):598-603.
[13]Kim YS,Park JG,Kim BS,et al.Diagnostic value of elastography using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and strain ratio for breast tumors[J].Journal of Breast Cancer,2014,17(1):76-82.
[14]Wojcinski S,Brandhorst K,Sadigh G,et al.Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with Virtual TouchTMtissue quantification:mean shear wave velocity of malignant and benign breast masses[J].Int J Womens Health,2013,5(default):619-627.
[15]Magalhaes M,Belooliveira P,Casaltalopes J,et al.Diagnostic value of ARFI (Acoustic radiation force impulse) in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions[J].Academic Radiology,2017,24(1):45-52.
[16]Kapetas P,Pinkerdomenig K,Woitek R,et al.Clinical application of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with virtual touch IQ in breast ultrasound:diagnostic performance and reproducibility of a new technique[J].Acta Radiologica,2016,58(2):140-147.
[17]You QQ,Xu M,Yao MH,et al.Diagnostic value of acoustic radiation force impulse for BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions of different sizes[J].Clin Hemorheol Microcirc,2018,70(2):143-154.
[18]Krouskop TA,Wheeler TM,Kallel F,et al.Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression[J].Ultrasonic Imaging,1998,20(4):260-274.
[19]Fenner J,Stacer AC,Winterroth F,et al.Macroscopic stiffness of breast tumors predicts metastasis[J].Sci Rep,2014,4(4):5512.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家重大研发计划项目(编号:2016YFC1303002)
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01